Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
May 21, 2012, 08:16:05 pm
Home Help Login Register
News: DATW - radio contest codes and conversation about anything forum! Discover the world from Vancouver and beyond!

DATW Forum  |  DISCOVER ALL THE WORLD  |  discover forum (Moderator: DATWMOD)  |  Topic: He or she? « previous next »
Pages: [1] 2 Go Down Print
Author Topic: He or she?  (Read 615 times)
Ojisan
Ethereal
*******
Posts: 10965


Unreconstructed hippy


« on: March 12, 2010, 07:23:13 am »

http://joeschwartz.net/shemale/#

I was right on 11 out of 16.
Logged
yorkcountykid
Ethereal
*******
Posts: 21110



« Reply #1 on: March 12, 2010, 10:37:48 am »

i got 13/16

i got the first 2 blondes wrong and the one with the hat licking the cane wrong.
Logged
charlieliberal
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 947


« Reply #2 on: March 12, 2010, 10:39:51 am »

I got half way through the test and got too grossed out and had to close it  Shocked
Logged
yorkcountykid
Ethereal
*******
Posts: 21110



« Reply #3 on: March 12, 2010, 10:40:43 am »

lol
Logged
Fornicator
Ethereal
*******
Posts: 6467



« Reply #4 on: March 12, 2010, 10:41:16 am »

12/16.

I'd hoped I would have done better.
Logged
Itsy Bitsy
Cosmic
******
Posts: 1450



« Reply #5 on: March 12, 2010, 10:46:03 am »

I got 12/16. Mostly I thought the uglier chicks were men.  Grin
Logged
Fornicator
Ethereal
*******
Posts: 6467



« Reply #6 on: March 12, 2010, 11:06:44 am »

In Thailand the uglier chicks are usually chicks.

Some of those ladyboys are totally convincing--unless you got them undressed, I suppose.

Luckily, I never hooked up with any of them.
Logged
yorkcountykid
Ethereal
*******
Posts: 21110



« Reply #7 on: March 12, 2010, 11:37:45 am »

In Thailand the uglier chicks are usually chicks.

Some of those ladyboys are totally convincing--unless you got them undressed, I suppose.

Luckily, I never hooked up with any of them.

i guess the only way one of them could fool a man into sex would be by only giving a blowjob. if this happened and the guy found out after he had been blown by a guy and murdered this f*** perv tranny for doing this, i would let him off the hook of all murder charges if i was on the jury. clearly, in this case, the killer is the victim and the murdered party (tranny) is the criminal.
« Last Edit: March 12, 2010, 11:40:51 am by yorkcountykid » Logged
sid
Cosmic
******
Posts: 1371


« Reply #8 on: March 13, 2010, 09:23:58 am »

Thats what Danny Bonnaduce said. He beat up a streetwalker he had picked up when "she " turned out to be a "he" and got thrown in jail for it. Of course guys who pick up streetwalkers are a well adjusted bunch in general, it was just that one time probably...
Logged
yorkcountykid
Ethereal
*******
Posts: 21110



« Reply #9 on: March 13, 2010, 10:20:37 am »

sid, i guess picking up a streetwalker is one way, but there are others. for instance, clubbing, late night restaurant, hitchhiker could be three out of many ways a guy could meet what he thinks is a female.

anyway, this should be solely focused on these sick f***s who would even attempt to trick straight guys into the sack. remember when f***s and all of their f*** loving supporters pleaded to just be treated as equals?? ?? --equal to very sick criminals is what they forgot to mention.
« Last Edit: March 13, 2010, 10:24:23 am by yorkcountykid » Logged
tasha
Ethereal
*******
Posts: 6159



« Reply #10 on: March 13, 2010, 04:20:39 pm »

11/16

yck, you have a good eye Smiley
Logged
yorkcountykid
Ethereal
*******
Posts: 21110



« Reply #11 on: March 13, 2010, 07:45:44 pm »

11/16

yck, you have a good eye Smiley

maybe tasha, but it is my belief that a man getting a low score or anything less THAN 100 percent only proves that we have a problem here. i think every f***/queer tricking men into any type of sex should be put against a wall a shot until dead and shot dead by the gov't. i am just sick sick sick of these perverted f***s being treated as equals to the decent people of our nation.
Logged
tasha
Ethereal
*******
Posts: 6159



« Reply #12 on: March 15, 2010, 06:04:47 pm »

^It doesn't prove there's a problem, it just proves some men carry out their "look" better than others.  I don't mind treating homosexuals/bisexuals/transsexuals as equals as long as they are maintaining respect for those around them. As for tricking someone into sex, that's never ok regardless the gender or sexual preference.
Logged
Itsy Bitsy
Cosmic
******
Posts: 1450



« Reply #13 on: March 16, 2010, 09:37:01 am »

If anything it proves that there isn't always a solid line between gay and straight or man and woman as many people can appear to be either gender.
Logged
yorkcountykid
Ethereal
*******
Posts: 21110



« Reply #14 on: March 16, 2010, 09:46:58 am »

oh com on, that is like saying there isn't always a solid line between life and death as many people can appear healthy and THEN just keel over dead.
Logged
Itsy Bitsy
Cosmic
******
Posts: 1450



« Reply #15 on: March 16, 2010, 11:04:07 am »

^ if you're going to use analogies, use them correctly. A comparable analogy would be if someone couldn't tell a live person from a dead one.
Logged
yorkcountykid
Ethereal
*******
Posts: 21110



« Reply #16 on: March 16, 2010, 11:34:53 am »

^ if you're going to use analogies, use them correctly. A comparable analogy would be if someone couldn't tell a live person from a dead one.

many people have died and been mistaken for sleeping, but i see your point and accept it.
however, your statement is, therefore, also flawed. you say many people can appear to be either gender and this is just not so. how many times have you actually asked yourself if you are looking at a male or female? myself, with very few exceptions, that only happens with very young children or babies.

anyway, there is seldom a solid line between anything, especially, until 'solid line' is defined. and, you are saying that gay and straight can be judged upon one's outward appearance. i'm quite sure this is not the case. these people are wearing make up. with make up they make people look any way they want. is dustin hoffman a f***? he looked female in 'tootsie'.

i agree i have seen a few cases that are hard to tell, but this is quite rare and i wouldn't say there are 'many' as you have stated. besides, as i said, there is no medical correlation between the natural, unaltered appearance and sexual preference in an average, healthy human being--is there?
Logged
Itsy Bitsy
Cosmic
******
Posts: 1450



« Reply #17 on: March 16, 2010, 11:50:32 am »

There's no logic in that last statement. In order for there to be a correlation (or lack thereof) you must have two VARIABLES. Being natural/unaltered is not a variable, it's a CONSTANT. Reevaluate your statement to be more logical, and then I will respond.
Logged
yorkcountykid
Ethereal
*******
Posts: 21110



« Reply #18 on: March 16, 2010, 12:07:36 pm »

the variable is between any natural/unaltered feminine/masculine appearance whether male/female and the lack of correlation is between this appearance and their sexual preference.

there is nothing to discuss here.
Logged
Itsy Bitsy
Cosmic
******
Posts: 1450



« Reply #19 on: March 16, 2010, 12:11:42 pm »

Again "natural/unaltered feminine/masculine appearance " is not a variable. Do you even knoe what correlation means?
Logged
yorkcountykid
Ethereal
*******
Posts: 21110



« Reply #20 on: March 16, 2010, 12:18:26 pm »

lol, you are just trying to start a fight cuz you know damn well there is no connection/correlation between  if a man looks feminine and is straight or a f*** and likewise for masculine looking women.
Logged
Itsy Bitsy
Cosmic
******
Posts: 1450



« Reply #21 on: March 16, 2010, 12:21:16 pm »

Connection would be an appropriate word to use here. Correlation is not. I'm not trying to start a fight, but it's difficult to have a discussion with you when you are misusing words and concepts. You are making it impossible to keep the discussion logical, and so it's ends up turning emotional and irrational. As always with you....
Logged
yorkcountykid
Ethereal
*******
Posts: 21110



« Reply #22 on: March 16, 2010, 12:25:42 pm »

correlation n. A causal, complementary, parallel, or reciprocal relationship, especially a structural, functional, or qualitative correspondence.

re·cip·ro·cal (r -s p r -k l). adj. 1. Concerning each of two or more persons or things. 2. Interchanged, given, or owed to each other:

i think correlation was a very appropriate word in this context.
Logged
Itsy Bitsy
Cosmic
******
Posts: 1450



« Reply #23 on: March 16, 2010, 12:29:40 pm »

Sure if you ignore this part of the defintion

"causal, complementary, parallel, or reciprocal relationship"
Logged
yorkcountykid
Ethereal
*******
Posts: 21110



« Reply #24 on: March 16, 2010, 12:34:19 pm »

are you kidding me? causal RELATIONSHIP, complementary RELATIOSHIP, parallel RELATIONSHIP.

correlation has the rootword 'RELATION'.  i said there was no relation, correlation or connection and there isn't.

oh, and i even gave you the definition of 'reciprocal'.
Logged
Pages: [1] 2 Go Up Print 
DATW Forum  |  DISCOVER ALL THE WORLD  |  discover forum (Moderator: DATWMOD)  |  Topic: He or she? « previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.10 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!